Oppo Reno13 vs. Reno13 Pro | Infinium-tech

The Oppo Reno13 series is out and about it, so you are probably wondering which one to get. But unlike last year, this year’s Oppo Reno 13 and Oppo Reno 13 Pro are more different than you think. There is also a non-trivial value difference. Reno13 Pro 256GB Vanilla Reno13 is more expensive than 256GB, while India has a difference of about 12,000.

The difference in size and camera count is clear from the specs sheet alone, so we will see how different these handsets are different in exercises, to see if we will put a deep dive in the Nitti and Sixth. Some Reno13 can get more suitable solutions ..

Subject:

For the beginning, you can compare full glasses sheets or continue with the evaluation of our editor directly In the following text.

Size comparison

The standard Reno13 is clearly more compact solution, with a 6.59 inch performance small and as a result, it is light, small and narrow. It is also thin in theory, but there are a nuance in behavior.

Even though the pro is thick on paper, it seems thin in the hand. This is because in addition to thickness, a few millimeters come from bulging performance, while the frame is quite thin. Keep in mind that the front glass on the Reno13 Pro is slightly curved from all sides, so it is slightly bulging. In contrast, Vanilla Reno has a completely flat front glass panel.

Reno13 Pro Vs Reno13

Build-wise, practically no difference. Both devices use Gorilla Glass 7 Eye Protection on the front side, standard glass on the back and an aluminum frame around. The devices are even ip68/IP69-preserved.

Performance comparison

There is compulsory difference in performance features – both have similar resolution, 10 -bit depth support, 120Hz refresh rates, and HDR10+ compatible.

The only real difference is the size, so the option is very clear. If you want more compact solutions, or want Reno13 Pro for large screen experience, get Reno13. According to today’s standards, 6.83-inch diagonal of Reno13 Pro is very large.

battery life

The Reno13 Pro has a 200 mAh larger battery compared to Reno13, but also a slightly larger performance. Two handsets share the same chipset, so do not count as a variable in the equation. At the end of the day, however, there is no difference in battery endurance, at least according to our tests.

The active use scores of both phones are very similar, with the Reno 13 out of their small performance, excludes the pro likeres. And this is quite clear from screen-on tests such as web browsing and video playback.

Either in case, you will get excellent battery life. Both devices are great artists in their respective price classes.

Charging speed

Two siblings are one of the fastest charging solutions in their classroom. They both support Oppo’s proprietary supervisor charging protocol and can only go from 0 to 100%. 42-43 minutesThere is no real world difference between the two, however.

In particular, the Reno13 Pro Fast 50W supports wireless charging, which is a bonus that will appreciate some of you.

Speaker test

While two handset speakers are equally loud, you can tell the difference in tuning. The sound of Reno13 is warm with more pronounced bass, but slightly muffer with vocals and high, while the Reno13 Pro presents a more balanced sound tuning.

Display

Reno13 and Reno13 Pro share the same dimension 8350 SoC, so there is no surprise here. The chip has an octa-core CPU and a mid-range GPU. Both are also enough for gaming.

Depending on the region, the Reno13 provides 8GB/128GB as the appropriate base memory configuration, while the Reno13 Pro starts at 12GB/256GB. Some areas leave the 128GB Reno13 version and start with 256GB. In both cases, the storage cap on 512GB as 1TB versions appears to be China-infinite.

Benchmark performance

So it is no surprise that there is no notable difference in performance. The small difference you see between the results is possibly due to statistical error.

Camera comparison

The largest feature of two Renos is within the gap camera hardware. While the 8MP ultravide camera coincides, the 50MP main sensor in the Reno13 Pro is quite large and adds 3.5x 50MP telephoto camera to the mixture.

On the front, the two brothers share the same 50mp selfie camera with AF.

We do not expect a massive difference in post-processing because they also share the same ISP and chipset.

image quality

On paper, the Reno13 Pro should distribute better -looking pictures with its main camera, but in fact, the difference is minute. To present the difference you have to keep a really close eye. When it comes to this right expansion, Pro has a minor advantage, but it is about it. It also goes to better present to red and blue, making the photos of daylight a little vibrant, but the overall color is not enough in case of saturation. Surprisingly, there are more balanced highlights in non-ex-flow.

Reno13 vs Reno13 Pro: 0.6x • 0.6x • 0.6x • 0.6x • 1x • 1x • 1x • 1x • 1x

The ultravide unit on non-ex it provides the same quality, as expected, but slightly better color saturation.

We cannot see any inequality in 2x crop zoom photos, but the difference between 3.5x stils is night and day, which is to be expected.

Reno13 vs. Reno13 Pro: 2x • 2x • 2x • 2x • 3.5x • 3.5x • 3.5x • 3.5x

Low-light photography goes to non-pro. Overall, the quality is the same, with Pro rendering a slightly more details, which can be caused by additional sharpness, but can produce silent colors. Although the vanilla does not offer the vibrancy of the Reno colors, it is still better than the Pro.

Reno13 vs Reno13 Pro: 0.6x • 0.6x • 0.6x • 0.6x • 1x • 1x • 1x • 1x • 1x

Ultravide quality and night rendering are similar.

There is no surprise here, 3.5x zoom photos at night are much better on Reno13 Pro.

Reno13 vs. Reno13 Pro: 2x • 2x • 2x • 2x • 3.5x • 3.5x • 3.5x • 3.5x

As expected, selfie looks similar. It is not worth noting here.

Selfie: Reno13 • Reno13 Pro • Reno13 • Reno13 Pro • Reno13 • Reno13 Pro

video quality

Below, we have some framegrabs from videos taken by two phones at each focal length, so it is easy to compare each other.

We did not find any meaningful difference of how these phones record videos. Overall, the quality is the same, the 13 Pro is a slightly better color with the main camera of the Pro. Low-light videos are accompanied by low exposure, which makes the shadow dark and more balanced. In addition, there is nothing to note.

Reno13 vs Reno13 Pro 4K Video Screengab: 1x • 1x • 2x • 2x

We had an interesting discovery, though. It cannot record 4K videos using its telephoto to Reno13 Pro. Zoom to 3.5x crops from the main camera, so we also recorded 1080p videos. It is quite clear that 1080p videos are much better than the 3.5x zoom camera dedicated to the Reno13 Pro.

Reno13 vs Reno13 Pro 1080p Video Screengab: 0.6X • 3.5x • 3.5x • 3.5x

We recommend checking Oppo Reno13 vs Reno13 Pro Playlist on YouTube with real footage Here,

Decision

As you can see, both devices are similar to each other, but the Pro pulls forward with a little better speakers and a more versatile camera system. This would be a more desirable option for anyone in search of a large screen experience. Therefore, if you need that 3.5x telephoto camera and additional screen real estate, the price difference will be justified.

However, Vanilla Reno 13 will give you the same user experience at a low price, making it a more intelligent option. Especially if you are in more compact form factors.